Resource detail

Clonogenic (colony formation) assay for stem cells

The clonogenic assay or colony forming assay is a well-established in vitro method for testing the survival and proliferative capability of cancer cells, and more recently cancer stem cells, under different treatment conditions 1.

The assay assesses clonogenicity: the ability of a cell to clone itself and grow into a full colony of cloned cells 2. This is typically an end-point based assay where colonies are fixed and stained and survival curves are plotted (find out more about clonogenic assays here).

Although colony formation assays are more widely known as a cancer biology assay, they do have applications in the field of stem cell biology where the self renewal potential of stem cells and their progenitors is assessed 3. Colony forming assays that are used in this context are not end-point based and rely on live cell imaging. The assay enables selection of desired colonies for further culturing and experimentation. Assessing colony formation is most commonly used for hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), in the form of a colony formation unit (CFU) assay.

This blog will focus on clonogenic assay applications in the field of HSCs.

Hematopoietic stem cells

Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation utilizing bone marrow as a stem cell source has become an accepted treatment mode for a variety of metabolic, immunologic, and hematologic disorders 4. HSCs have the ability to differentiate into all hematopoietic lineages (figure. 1) while also maintaining their self-renewal capacity.

Although HSCs have the capacity to proliferate and differentiate in culture, most cells detected in hematopoietic culture assays consist of hematopoietic progenitor cells, which have limited self-renewal capacity and short-term hematopoietic potential.



Figure 1 | Hierarchical models of HSC self-renewal and differentiation 4. (A) Initial view showing all lymphoid and all myeloid potentialities as the first lineage groupings to be segregated. (B) A more detailed view of the compartmentalization of intermediate, lineage-restricted progenitor subsets based on their behavior in short-term in vitro colony assays and properties allowing their separate isolation. HSC hematopoietic stem cell, CRU competitive repopulating unit, CFU-S colony-forming unit-spleen, CFU-GEMM colony-forming unit-granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, megakaryocyte, BFU-E burst-forming unit-erythroid, CFU-E colony-forming unit-erythroid, CFU-G colony-forming unit-granulocyte, CFU-M colony-forming unit macrophage, BFU-Mk burst-forming unit-megakaryocyte, CFU-Mk colony-forming unit-megakaryocyte, BM bone marrow.

Colony forming units assays

A clonogenic assay is the most direct quantitative means of measuring human hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Hematopoietic colonies are essentially clones of cells produced by a single progenitor cell. The aim of colony-forming unit (CFU) assays is to define the potential of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell populations for proliferation and lineage differentiation. Furthermore, the colonies can be morphologically analyzed (figure. 2) 4.

Figure 2 | Classes of human hematopoietic progenitors 4. (A) Colony-forming unit-erythroid (CFU-E) consisting of typically 8-200 mature erythroid progenitors. (B) Burstforming unit-erythroid (BFU-E) are more immature progenitors and produce a colony containing more than 200 erythroblasts. (C) Colony-forming unit-granulocyte, macrophage (CFU-GM) can contain thousands of granulocytes or macrophages. (D) Small colony forming unit-granulocyte, erythroid, macrophage, megakaryocyte (CFU-GEMM) are progenitors that can form colonies in semi-solid culture medium.

The selection of stem cell products for transplantation is typically based primarily upon non-functional cellular parameters such as total nucleated cell counts and cellular immunophenotypes (e.g. CD34+ cell counts). However, it has been found that the absence of functional hematopoietic information can result in the selection of low potency stem cell products that fail to engraft in a patient despite a unit having a high cell count with an acceptable phenotype 5.

The functional analysis of hematopoietic progenitor cells using a CFU assay enables measurement of the potency of self-renewal of hematopoietic progenitors present in stem cell products. This is critical for comparative selection of the highest quality stem cell product for a therapeutic application.

CD34+ or CD133+ HSCs give rise to two types of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) colonies: primitive and definitive EPC-colony forming units, which can be morphologically defined. Based on their morphology, an evaluation of the number or the ratio of each EPC colony constitutes the endothelial progenitor cell clonogenic forming assay (EPC-CFA), an assay to quantify the differentiation of colony forming EPCs. This assay system allows us to practically evaluate the vasculogenic potential of primary or cultured stem cell populations, i.e., mononuclear cells or fractionated stem cells (CD34+ or CD133+ cells) in peripheral blood, bone marrow, or umbilical cord blood.

EPC-CFA can be used not only for basic research in vascular biology but also for evaluating the vascular reparative activity of patients with cardiovascular diseases 6. Masuda et al. (2011) describe a clonogenic assay system for the quantitative and qualitative analysis of human EPCs based on the EPC differentiation hierarchy (figure. 3). The authors found that small EPC colony-forming cells can be seen as “primitive EPC,” which are possibly derived from further immature and proliferative EPCs, and large EPC colony-forming cells can be seen as “definitive-EPC,” which are more prone to differentiate and promote EPC-mediated cell functions required for vasculogenesis. Definitive large EPCs are capable of differentiating into a non-colonizing large EPC phenotype 7.




Figure 3 | The classification of endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) differentiation detected by EPC colony-forming assay (CFA) 7. EPC-CFA identifies the EPC differentiation hierarchy by the difference of morphological and functional properties after the transition from a nonadhesive to an adhesive phenotype.

Endothelial colony forming cells (ECFCs) are a subset of EPCs and are of interest as a possible therapeutic target for hypoxic diseases as they have high angiogenic potential. However, translation to clinical therapies has shown limited success 8. This is partly explained by the difficulty of expanding EPCs into appropriate numbers due to senescence of the isolated cells. Huuskes et al. (2019), describe a method using live cell imaging and automated image analysis to analyse the colony forming ability of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs).


Patient EPCs transform into ECFCs which are identified by morphology change, increased proliferative capacity and the formation of an ECFC colony. Assessment of clonal expansion using live cell imaging and automated image analysis to identify and inspect colony size enabled identification of ECFC colonies with angiogenic potential (figure 4). This approach proved to be useful to correctly identify ECFCs ready for passaging to increase culture success and ultimately increase the therapeutic potential of ECFCs in treating vascular diseases 9.

Figure 4 | Assessment of clonal expansion of patient isolated endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and the use of image J to inspect colony size. Morphological changes of patient isolated peripheral blood mononuclear cells at 7 days of initial culture showed transformation into a mature, proliferative colony. The image of the colony was transformed from a bright field image to a binary image. For this representative patient, this method confirmed that the colony size was not sufficient to passage, and therefore a continued culture time was required.

To Conclude

Advancement in our understanding of the biology of adult stem cells and their therapeutic potential relies heavily on meaningful functional assays that can identify and measure stem cell activity in vitro and in vivo. Live cell imaging technologies with automated colony formation analysis algorithms have the potential to be very beneficial for stem cell colony forming/unit assays.

----------------

CytoSMART Technologies has developed an automated bright-field lab microscope, CytoSMART Omni that visualizes complete culture vessels and operates from inside a standard CO2-incubator. It has a built in colony detection algorithm. Colony count, size and circularity measurements are provided and can be used in the context of identifying types of colonies and their self renewal potential.

------------------

Author

Dr. Jenna Bleloch

Jenna is a recent PhD graduate, specializing in Medical Cell Biology. She has a passion for learning and is driven by her curiosity. Her free time is spent as a freelance medical writer where she hopes to contribute towards communicating science to the world.


Learn About all CytoSMART imaging solutions here

References

  1. Rafehi, H. et al. Clonogenic Assay: Adherent Cells. Journal of Visualized Experiments (2011). doi:10.3791/2573
  2. Franken, N. A. P., Rodermond, H. M., Stap, J., Haveman, J. & Bree, C. V. Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nature Protocols 1, 2315–2319 (2006).
  3. Rheinwatd, J. G. & Green, H. Seria cultivation of strains of human epidemal keratinocytes: the formation keratinizin colonies from single cell is. Cell 6, 331–343 (1975).
  4. Kronstein-Wiedemann, R. & Tonn, T. Colony Formation: An Assay of Hematopoietic Progenitor Cells. Stem Cell Mobilization Methods in Molecular Biology 29–40 (2019).
  5. Pamphilon, D. et al. Current practices and prospects for standardization of the hematopoietic colony-forming unit assay: a report by the cellular therapy team of the Biomedical Excellence for Safer Transfusion (BEST) Collaborative. Cytotherapy 15, 255–262 (2013).
  6. Masuda, H. & Asahara, T. Clonogenic assay of endothelial progenitor cells. Trends in Cardiovascular Medicine 23, 99–103 (2013).
  7. Masuda, H. et al. Methodological Development of a Clonogenic Assay to Determine Endothelial Progenitor Cell Potential. Circulation Research 109, 20–37 (2011).
  8. Huuskes, B. M., Debuque, R. J., Kerr, P. G., Samuel, C. S. & Ricardo, S. D. The Use of Live Cell Imaging and Automated Image Analysis to Assist With Determining Optimal Parameters for Angiogenic Assay in vitro. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 7, (2019).
  9. Huuskes, B. M., Debuque, R. J., Kerr, P. G., Samuel, C. S. & Ricardo, S. D. The Use of Live Cell Imaging and Automated Image Analysis to Assist With Determining Optimal Parameters for Angiogenic Assay in vitro. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 7, (2019).
Sign up now

Want to stay up to date? Sign up for our newsletter

No, thanks